首页> 外文OA文献 >Imaging Non-Specific Wrist Pain: Interobserver Agreement and Diagnostic Accuracy of SPECT/CT, MRI, CT, Bone Scan and Plain Radiographs
【2h】

Imaging Non-Specific Wrist Pain: Interobserver Agreement and Diagnostic Accuracy of SPECT/CT, MRI, CT, Bone Scan and Plain Radiographs

机译:影像非特异性腕痛:SPECT / CT,MRI,CT,骨扫描和X线平片的观察者之间的一致性和诊断准确性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

PURPOSE: Chronic hand and wrist pain is a common clinical issue for orthopaedic surgeons and rheumatologists. The purpose of this study was 1. To analyze the interobserver agreement of SPECT/CT, MRI, CT, bone scan and plain radiographs in patients with non-specific pain of the hand and wrist, and 2. to assess the diagnostic accuracy of these imaging methods in this selected patient population.\udMATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two consecutive patients with non-specific pain of the hand or wrist were evaluated retrospectively. All patients had been imaged by plain radiographs, planar early-phase imaging (bone scan), late-phase imaging (SPECT/CT including bone scan and CT), and MRI. Two experienced and two inexperienced readers analyzed the images with a standardized read-out protocol. Reading criteria were lesion detection and localisation, type and etiology of the underlying pathology. Diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement were determined for all readers and imaging modalities.\udRESULTS: The most accurate modality for experienced readers was SPECT/CT (accuracy 77%), followed by MRI (56%). The best performing, though little accurate modality for inexperienced readers was also SPECT/CT (44%), followed by MRI and bone scan (38% each). The interobserver agreement of experienced readers was generally high in SPECT/CT concerning lesion detection (kappa 0.93, MRI 0.72), localisation (kappa 0.91, MRI 0.75) and etiology (kappa 0.85, MRI 0.74), while MRI yielded better results on typification of lesions (kappa 0.75, SPECT/CT 0.69). There was poor agreement between experienced and inexperienced readers in SPECT/CT and MRI.\udCONCLUSIONS: SPECT/CT proved to be the most helpful imaging modality in patients with non-specific wrist pain. The method was found reliable, providing high interobserver agreement, being outperformed by MRI only concerning the typification of lesions. We believe it is beneficial to integrate SPECT/CT into the diagnostic imaging algorithm of chronic wrist pain.
机译:目的:慢性手和腕关节疼痛是整形外科医生和风湿病医生的常见临床问题。这项研究的目的是1.分析手和腕部非特异性疼痛患者的SPECT / CT,MRI,CT,骨扫描和X线平片的观察者一致性,以及2.评估这些患者的诊断准确性影像学方法。\材料和方法:回顾性分析了32例连续的手或腕部非特异性疼痛患者。所有患者均已通过平片,平面早期成像(骨扫描),晚期成像(SPECT / CT包括骨扫描和CT)和MRI进行了成像。两名经验丰富的读者和两名经验不足的读者使用标准化的读出协议对图像进行了分析。阅读标准是病变的检测和定位,潜在病理的类型和病因。确定所有阅读器和成像方式的诊断准确性和观察者之间的一致性。\结果:有经验的阅读器最准确的方式是SPECT / CT(准确性77%),其次是MRI(56%)。 SPECT / CT(44%)对经验不足的读者而言表现最佳,尽管准确度极低,其次是MRI和骨扫描(各38%)。有经验的读者的观察者间共识在SPECT / CT中通常很高,涉及病变检测(kappa 0.93,MRI 0.72),定位(kappa 0.91,MRI 0.75)和病因学(kappa 0.85,MRI 0.74),而MRI对病变(κ0.75,SPECT / CT 0.69)。结论:SPECT / CT被证明是非特异性腕痛患者最有用的影像学检查方法。该方法被认为是可靠的,提供了较高的观察者间一致性,仅在病变类型方面,MRI优于该方法。我们认为将SPECT / CT集成到慢性腕痛的诊断成像算法中是有益的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号